Disclaimer: I am not a psychologist nor I joined any sorority, in short I didn’t experience any hazing.
Hazing is the physical and psychological abused intended to a person who wanted to become a member of an exclusive group.
This is my attempt to scrutinize this action where the one being hurt actually gave his consent just to prove he is worthy to be part of the exclusive group. The promised benefit at the end is brotherhood.
The logic is if a person can endure the abuse then he has proven his loyalty. How was it done? Booze and Bruise! There is a tendency of death so is it done right?
The underlying question is can pain really a good equivalent for loyalty? Think of what are you loyal about in your life? Are you loyal of anything? How did you get to that state? Is an actual pain a real test or it was a psychological thought that once you’ve endured the pain your mindset is changed and your loyalty is never to be broken?
For the promise of brotherhood (or a silent promise of be loyal to us and we’ll protect you from anything), will you ever hurt someone to enjoy power? Or to hurt as a revenge (it was done to me now it’s my turn to do it to someone else)? Wait up! Will you really hurt someone so bad and at the end of the pain you take his hand, embrace him, and call him your brother? (It sounds absurd and twisted!)
For the person who will do anything to belong, is it worth it?
The way I see it, the act is CRUELTY.

In an actual NEWS, a law student is yet again killed by fellow law students. Isn’t lawyer will work to protect people from being abused and actually put the perpetrator in jail? Or what am I saying of course they didn’t know that, the whole point of being a student and still learning. (I am mocking in my mind relentlessly right now.)
In some interviews on why does hazing had to be done – the most common answer is it’s tradition. If tradition start killing a person there is a good reason to review it and start creating a new one!
Why do we need to turn to negativity to reinforce a positive outcome? Is that to really create a balance? I think it would have been better if the initiation to make someone belong to a group is for that someone to be challenged on what he can do to keep the group a better one. If it’s for instance a fraternity of soon-to-be lawyers, why not find a case and defend the impossible with a real lawyer of course and if he does win it then he is worthy to belong in a group who has the same belief as his. There are so many positive ways – we should not forget what is morally right and what is kind.
For those who still intend to use a paddle to find out a man’s endurance and loyalty, I hope every time you hit someone, it breaks your heart, but if you can’t feel a bite in your heart, I am sorry to say that you’re in a wrong place and you don’t deserve to hold a paddle.